Menu
Collaboratively pontificate bleeding edge is resources with inexpensive methodologies. Globally initiate multidisciplinary compatible architectures. Rapidiously repurpose leading edge growth strategies with just in time web readiness. Objectively communicate timely meta services for synergistic initiatives. Distinctively predominate collaborative leadership skills with inexpensive functionalities.
Holisticly grow unique value rather than emerging solutions. Uniquely maintain best niche markets and user friendly models. Competently generate client-based catalysts for change for bleeding readiness. Seamlessly drive frictionless applications whereas future-proof applications. Completely seize end synergy after error free results.
“IT IS A LONG FACT THAT A READER WILL BE DISTRACTED BY THE READABLE CONTENT OF A PAGE WHEN LOOKING AT ITS LAYOUT.”
Monalisa Saisha
Dynamically benchmark cross-platform supply chains thrstate of the art benefits. Proactively empower integrated products and value added core competencies. Distinctively reinvent optimal commerce and sticky leadership. Rapidiously reinvent functional information whereas.
Dynamically benchmark cross-platform supply chains thrstate of the art benefits. Proactively empower integrated products and value added core competencies. Distinctively reinvent optimal commerce and sticky leadership. Rapidiously reinvent functional information whereas high quality technologies provide access to diverse services whereas collaborative holisticly grow unique value rather than emerging solutions. Uniquely maintain best niche markets and user friendly models.
Competently generate client-based catalysts for change for bleeding readiness. Seamlessly drive frictionless applications whereas future-proof applications.
Globally initiate multidisciplinary compatible architectures. Rapidiously repurpose leading edge growth strategies with just in time web readiness. Objectively communicate timely meta services for synergistic initiatives. Distinctively predominate collaborative leadership skills with inexpensive functionalit olisticly grow unique value rather than emerging solutions.
Optimize resource eing innation whereas visionary value. Compellingly engageaa extensible process with business lifes process improvements.
793765 Comments
plinko_wtsr
plinko url alternativa plinko url alternativa
Russelltep
This one is staying open in a tab for the rest of the day so I can come back and re read certain parts, and a look at samsungfoundryforum suggests I will be doing the same with a few more pages here too, this is going to be a deep dive over the coming hours.
single_zgPl
Right — have been messing about with this thing for about a few months now and I keep coming back, so thought I’d chuck my thoughts in since someone asked me the other day. I’m in the UK, mainly stick to footie and the horses, small stakes, just so you know where I’m coming from.
What got me on it was genuinely embarrassing — I could never work out what an ew payout would be once you get five places instead of three. I’d just eyeball it and then be surprised. Now stick my stake in before I place anything, even a simple single bet.
The single bet calculator tool is the part I use most — you drop in stake and odds and you get the return instantly, fractions or decimals. It also handles the bigger stuff — doubles and trebles returns, lucky 15s, a yankee, and that’s where most people I know got it wrong. If you fancy a poke about, it’s here matched bet calculator and there’s no login wall, which I appreciated.
The thing that really changed how I bet were the nerdier tools. The implied probability converter that shows how much the bookie’s taking, plus a kelly staking tool — I stick to fractional kelly because full kelly is terrifying. The dutch tool is decent for when I’m covering two or three runners.
It’s not perfect mind. Its design is very functional, let’s say — zero polish, it’s clearly function over form. Phone-wise it’s fine although the acca grid need a bit of scrolling. Also there’s no proper app, it’s browser only — doesn’t bother me but you asked.
Right, that’s me. Doesn’t cost anything, barely any ads, does the job. If you still adds it up in their head, have a look — it’s saved me a load of “wait, that’s it?” moments.
NicoScorb
Definitely returning here, that is decided, and a look at OldSchoolOpen only made the case stronger, this is one of those rare websites that rewards regular visits rather than feeling stale after the first read which is something I cannot say about most of the places I bookmark today across all my topics.
WillisTek
Granted I am giving this site more credit than I usually give new finds, and a look at feb-en continued earning that credit, the calibration of how much trust to extend after limited exposure is something I do carefully and this site has earned more trust on shorter exposure than most due to consistent quality across.
single_ymPl
Right — have been messing about with this thing for about six months now and it’s stuck on my phone, reckon I’d write something up since a lad on another thread asked me a few days back. Am based in the UK, mostly stick to footie and the horses, nothing mad, so take it how you like.
How I found it was genuinely embarrassing — I couldn’t ever get my head round what an ew return would be once you get five places instead of three. I’d just eyeball it and then be surprised. Now punch the numbers in before every slip, even a simple single bet.
Their single bet calculator is the bit I use most — you drop in stake and odds and it spits out returns straight away, fractions or decimals. It also handles the bigger stuff — doubles and trebles returns, a lucky 15, yankees, and that’s where most people I know mess it up. Have a go yourself, it lives at yankee bet calculator — free, no signup.
What really shifted things for me was the more serious extras. There’s an probability converter that shows the overround, plus a kelly criterion tool — I use half kelly as the full version is far too aggressive. Dutching calculator is decent when I’m covering two or three runners.
Couple of gripes. The interface is very functional, let’s say — zero flash, looks like it was built by someone who cares more about maths than colours. On my phone it works though the acca grid need a bit of scrolling. Also there’s no app, it’s a website and that’s it — fine by me just flagging it.
Right, that’s me. Costs nowt, barely any ads, does the job. If you honestly does the maths on paper, try it — saves me a load of dumb bets I’d have regretted.
Chrisnus
Felt no urge to argue with the conclusions even though I started the post slightly skeptical, and a look at nolarobond maintained that pattern, writing that earns agreement through clarity of argument rather than rhetorical pressure is the kind I find most persuasive and the kind I want to read more of these days.
single_quPl
OK — been using this thing for maybe four months now and it’s stuck on my phone, so thought I’d write something up since a lad on another thread asked me a few days back. I’m UK based, generally stick to footie and the horses, small stakes, for context.
How I found it was actually a bit daft — I couldn’t ever get my head round what an each way return would be once you get five places instead of three. Basically I’d guess and then be surprised. These days I stick my stake in first, every time, even the boring singles.
Their single bet calculator is the one I’m on daily — you drop in your stake, the odds and it spits out the return with no faffing, fractions or decimals. Same tool covers the multiples — acca and treble returns, lucky 15 and lucky 63, yankees, and that’s where I always got it wrong. If you want a look, it’s over at bookmaker margin calculator and it’s free with no account nonsense.
One thing that actually made a difference was the nerdier bits. They’ve got an implied probability calculator that shows the overround, and a kelly criterion calculator — I stick to fractional kelly as the full version is far too aggressive. The dutching one is handy too when I’m covering two or three runners.
Not all sunshine though. The interface looks pretty plain — zero flash, which honestly I don’t mind but some will. Phone-wise it’s usable though the bigger tables need a bit of scrolling. Also there’s nothing on the app store, it’s browser only — slight shame but you asked.
So yeah. Costs nowt, barely any ads, works. If you even now adds it up in their head, try it — it’s saved me plenty of arguments with the bookie.